> As there is a dump_stack() done on memory allocation
> failures, these messages might as well be deleted instead.
* I imagine that an other wording variant can become clearer
for the change description.
* I suggest to reconsider the patch subject.
…
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c
> @@ -632,7 +632,6 @@ static int btrfsic_process_superblock(struct
> btrfsic_state *state,
>
> selected_super = kzalloc(sizeof(*selected_super), GFP_NOFS);
> if (NULL == selected_super) {
> - pr_info("btrfsic: error, kmalloc failed!\n");
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
How do you think about to use the following error handling instead?
if (!selected_super)
return -ENOMEM;
Regards,
Markus
