On Thu, 2020-06-11 at 13:54 +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 12:36 PM Joe Perches <j...@perches.com> wrote: > > Exactly. So don't set a new hard limit of 100. > > > > This would _always_ wrap lines to 100 columns when > > 80 columns is still preferred. > > Why is 80 "still preferred" to begin with?
That's neither my nor your issue to solve. It does though underline why this patch should not be applied.
