On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 10:48 PM <t...@redhat.com> wrote:
[...]
> diff --git a/security/selinux/ss/conditional.c 
> b/security/selinux/ss/conditional.c
> index da94a1b4bfda..d0d6668709f0 100644
> --- a/security/selinux/ss/conditional.c
> +++ b/security/selinux/ss/conditional.c
> @@ -392,26 +392,21 @@ static int cond_read_node(struct policydb *p, struct 
> cond_node *node, void *fp)
>
>                 rc = next_entry(buf, fp, sizeof(u32) * 2);
>                 if (rc)
> -                       goto err;
> +                       return rc;
>
>                 expr->expr_type = le32_to_cpu(buf[0]);
>                 expr->bool = le32_to_cpu(buf[1]);
>
>                 if (!expr_node_isvalid(p, expr)) {
>                         rc = -EINVAL;
> -                       goto err;
> +                       return rc;
>                 }

Sorry for more nitpicking... This can be further simplified to just
"return -EINVAL;" and the braces can be removed.

>         }
>
>         rc = cond_read_av_list(p, fp, &node->true_list, NULL);
>         if (rc)
> -               goto err;
> +               return rc;
>         rc = cond_read_av_list(p, fp, &node->false_list, &node->true_list);
> -       if (rc)
> -               goto err;
> -       return 0;
> -err:
> -       cond_node_destroy(node);
>         return rc;

Also here you can skip the rc assignment:

return cond_read_av_list(p, fp, &node->false_list, &node->true_list);

>  }
>
> --
> 2.18.1

--
Ondrej Mosnacek
Software Engineer, Platform Security - SELinux kernel
Red Hat, Inc.

Reply via email to