On Thu, Oct 18 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > It would always be nice. For this case I don't think it's very > > > interesting, if we pursue the improved sg iteration setup. > > > > BTW, I think it's pretty clear that ata_sg_is_last() is broken. It's > > likely a one-off in the n_iter test. > > fixing that would be a -stable candidate, as a potential data corruptor > - or is it more benign?
I think it's safe to say that it was sg chaining introduced breakage, so it should work fine in 2.6.23.x. -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
