Hi Hyunchul,
> We need to commit dirty metadata and pages to disk before remounting exfat as
> read-only.
>
> This fixes a failure in xfstests generic/452
Could you please elaborate more the reason why generic/452 in xfstests failed ?
>
> Signed-off-by: Hyunchul Lee <hyc....@gmail.com>
> ---
> fs/exfat/super.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/exfat/super.c b/fs/exfat/super.c index
> e650e65536f8..61c6cf240c19 100644
> --- a/fs/exfat/super.c
> +++ b/fs/exfat/super.c
> @@ -693,10 +693,29 @@ static void exfat_free(struct fs_context *fc)
> }
> }
>
> +static int exfat_reconfigure(struct fs_context *fc) {
> + struct super_block *sb = fc->root->d_sb;
> + int ret;
int ret = 0;
> + bool new_rdonly;
> +
> + new_rdonly = fc->sb_flags & SB_RDONLY;
> + if (new_rdonly != sb_rdonly(sb)) {
If you modify it like this, would not we need new_rdonly?
if (fc->sb_flags & SB_RDONLY && !sb_rdonly(sb))
> + if (new_rdonly) {
> + /* volume flag will be updated in exfat_sync_fs */
> + ret = sync_filesystem(sb);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
I think that this ret check can be removed by using return ret; below ?
> + }
> + }
> + return 0;
return ret;
> +}
> +
> static const struct fs_context_operations exfat_context_ops = {
> .parse_param = exfat_parse_param,
> .get_tree = exfat_get_tree,
> .free = exfat_free,
> + .reconfigure = exfat_reconfigure,
> };
>
> static int exfat_init_fs_context(struct fs_context *fc)
> --
> 2.17.1
