On Sat 2020-06-13 09:57:24, Jim Cromie wrote: > make the code-block reusable to later handle "file foo.c:101-200" etc.
> This should be a 90%+ code-move, with minimal adaptations; reindent, > and scafolding. This sentence sounds like the author did some hidden microoptimizations and potentially broke the code. It made me nervous. But in fact, I do not see any real change except that the variable "first" does not longer need to be defined. So, it is just a code move. In this case, I usually write: This patch does not change the existing behavior. Best Regards, Petr
