On 2020-06-15 18:19:18 [+0200], Stephen Berman wrote: > It's there, 196 lines above the Start ffff8d7aa8758a80 line: > > Jun 15 08:56:58 strobe-jhalfs kernel: [ 106.275356] acpi_os_execute(1109) > Adding acpi_ev_notify_dispatch+0x0/0x55 ffff8d7aa84e70a0 <ffff8d7aa8758a80>
So compared with | [ 193.321242] acpi_os_execute_deferred_notify(851) Start ffff8d7aa8758a80 acpi_ev_notify_dispatch+0x0/0x55(ffff8d7aa84e70a0) it took ~87 seconds for the item to start since it was enqueued. Assuming that workqueue still makes progress on shutdown it may just a long time to flush all worker on shutdown. I still have no idea how the commit in question is responsible for that behaviour… > Steve Berman Sebastian
