On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Ingo Oeser wrote:
>
> cramfs is a read-only fs. So we should honour that in inode->mode to
> avoid confusion of programs.
No no no. This breaks device nodes etc quite badly.
A change to mkcramfs might be fine - but it has to conditionalize on the
file being a regular file. Not a blanket "everything is read-only".
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so honour this i... Alexander Viro
- Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so honour this i... Shane Nay
- Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so honour th... Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so honou... Doug McNaught
- Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so ... Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only,... Doug McNaught
- Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so honour this i... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so honour th... Rusty Russell
- Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so honou... Linus Torvalds
- Linus Torvalds

