-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Rene Herman wrote: > That first threshold sounds fine yes. To me, the second mostly sounds > like a job for SIGTERM though.
I agree. Applications shouldn't be expected to be yet more complicated and have different levels of low memory handling. You might want to give a process a second shot at handling SIGDANGER but after that's it's all about preparation for a shutdown. - -- ➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHF9m/2ijCOnn/RHQRAhwjAKC38y1OLv0mE5sWHY31CwJ2ZaoAXwCglDTO 05pmpe8jMVhwM0nlCHqZyaQ= =5DvG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
