Em Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 02:27:40PM +0800, Jin, Yao escreveu: > On 6/16/2020 2:16 PM, Ian Rogers wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 6:00 PM Jin, Yao <yao....@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > Can I get an ACK for this patchset? > > > On 6/3/2020 10:18 AM, Jin Yao wrote: > > > > This patchset updates CascadelakeX events to v1.08 and > > > > updates SkylakeX events to v1.21.
> > > > The events have been tested on CascadelakeX and SkylakeX > > > > servers with latest perf/core branch. > > could you rebase this on Arnaldo's tmp.perf/core tree? > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git/log/?h=tmp.perf/core > > I tried using git am but get: > > Applying: perf vendor events: Update CascadelakeX events to v1.08 > > error: patch fragment without header at line 279: @@ -213,14 +220,14 @@ > > error: could not build fake ancestor > > Patch failed at 0001 perf vendor events: Update CascadelakeX events to v1.08 > > > > Thanks, > > Ian > > > > The patchset are applied OK on perf/core branch. > > As far as I understand, the patch for posting should be based on perf/core > branch, is it right? Sorry, I've been testing with using tmp.perf/core as a way to more quickly make available what I've processed, before I test it thoroughly both with container builds and with manual testing, so the bleeding edge is there, perf/core becoming a bit more stable, as I'll try not to rebase it like before. - Arnaldo
