> (
> * size = E1 * E2;@p
> |
> * size = E1 * E2 * E3;@p
> |
> * size = E1 * E2 + E3;@p
> )

I suggest to reconsider also the order of elements for such a SmPL disjunction.

Can a computation like “E2 * E3” also be matched by the expression
metavariable “E2” alone?

Regards,
Markus

Reply via email to