On Fri, 2007-10-19 at 14:43 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> plain text document attachment (rt-balance-pull-tasks.patch)

> +static int pull_rt_task(struct rq *this_rq)
> +{
> +     struct task_struct *next;
> +     struct task_struct *p;
> +     struct rq *src_rq;
> +     int this_cpu = this_rq->cpu;
> +     int cpu;
> +     int ret = 0;
> +
> +     assert_spin_locked(&this_rq->lock);
> +
> +     if (likely(!atomic_read(&rt_overload)))
> +             return 0;

This seems to be the only usage of rt_overload. I'm not sure its worth
keeping it around for this.

> +     next = pick_next_task_rt(this_rq);
> +
> +     for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, rto_cpumask) {
> +             if (this_cpu == cpu)
> +                     continue;

...

> +     }
> +
> +     return ret;
> +}


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to