On 17-06-20, 13:47, Sudeep Holla wrote: > This is first step towards avoiding polling based cpufreq set if firmware > has fast access registers that bypass normal mailbox based messaging. > > If you happy with this and provide ack, I will take this along with scmi > changes via ARM SoC. Hope that is fine by you.
Sudeep, I am not sure how it concerns me frankly :) AFAICT, this is enabling fast switch based on some mechanism (internal to scmi) and so either the cpufreq driver will have fast-switch enabled or not, and both are fine by the cpufreq core. And so I am confused on why my Ack is important here :) -- viresh
