David Heidelberg <da...@ixit.cz> writes: > is there chance to get this patch included or could be this issue > solved with different approach?
Included into what? This patch is incorrect as I pointed out in review here: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/alpine.deb.2.21.1812071143480.14...@nanos.tec.linutronix.de/ So why are you even asking? I recommended to switch this away from chained handler and then the whole story ended with this mail: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/alpine.deb.2.21.1812071404140.14...@nanos.tec.linutronix.de/ I have no idea how the GPIO people solved that problem, but certainly not by applying this. Thanks, tglx
