On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 09:59:05AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> The new warnings don't seem to be due to the kernel test robot having
> an old version of sparse, but just because the error strings changed,
> and presumably the kernel test robot has some "ignore old sparse
> warnings" logic.
> 
> So the warnings all look new, even if they aren't.

What is strange is that only some of these warnings are shown as
new, but not all.  For example it shows
  >> drivers/spi/spi-fsl-spi.c:93:44: sparse:     got void [noderef] __iomem 
*reg_base

as new, but not the following one:
  drivers/spi/spi-fsl-spi.c:294:44: sparse:     got void [noderef] __iomem 
*reg_base

while both have their string changed (__iomem).

Just to be sure, I checked this file and (of course) all these
warnings are old ones, caused by a missing __iomem in the assignments:
        struct fsl_spi_reg *reg_base = mspi->reg_base;

Why some are shown as new and some as old is a mystery to me.

-- Luc

Reply via email to