On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 11:17:09PM +0200, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
> > > <snip>
> > > trace_rcu_invoke_kfree_bulk_callback(
> > > rcu_state.name, bkvhead[i]->nr_records,
> > > bkvhead[i]->records);
> > > if (i == 0)
> > > kfree_bulk(bkvhead[i]->nr_records,
> > > bkvhead[i]->records);
> > > else
> > > vfree_bulk(bkvhead[i]->nr_records,
> > > bkvhead[i]->records);
> > > <snip>
> > >
> > > Matthew, what is your thought?
> >
> > That was my thinking too. If we had a kvfree_bulk(), I would expect it to
> > handle a mixture of vfree and kfree, but you've segregated them already.
> > So I think this is better.
> >
> Yes, the segregation is done. Having vfree_bulk() is enough then.
> We are on the same page :)
Very good. When does kfree_rcu() and friends move out of kernel/rcu?
Thanx, Paul
