Kieran Bingham, Thu, Jun 18, 2020 18:17:04 +0200:
> On 02/04/2020 19:34, Alex Riesen wrote:
> > To avoid setting it up even if the hardware is not actually connected
> > to anything physically.
> >
> > Besides, the bindings explicitly notes that port definitions are
> > "optional if they are not connected to anything at the hardware level".
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Riesen <alexander.rie...@cetitec.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/media/i2c/adv748x/adv748x-dai.c | 5 +++++
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/adv748x/adv748x-dai.c
> > b/drivers/media/i2c/adv748x/adv748x-dai.c
> > index 185f78023e91..f9cc47fa9ad1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/i2c/adv748x/adv748x-dai.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/adv748x/adv748x-dai.c
> > @@ -216,6 +216,11 @@ int adv748x_dai_init(struct adv748x_dai *dai)
> > int ret;
> > struct adv748x_state *state = adv748x_dai_to_state(dai);
> >
> > + if (!state->endpoints[ADV748X_PORT_I2S]) {
> > + adv_info(state, "no I2S port, DAI disabled\n");
> > + ret = 0;
> > + goto fail;
>
> How about just 'return 0'?
Indeed. In the retrospect, the whole event of loading the DAI driver does not
feel that important anymore to warrant logging on info prio.
> Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+rene...@ideasonboard.com>
>
> This could also be folded into 5/9 too I guess?, though it is easier to
> review the sequential additions, rather than the one-big-feature
> addition ;-)
I would prefer to have it separately, if you don't mind: maybe not a big one,
but loading a driver without hardware for it *is* an event.
Thanks,
Alex
