Hi, > > If rt2x00 is loaded and detected the device, it should print out a debug > > message that starts with: > > "Chipset detected - " What is in your case the complete line? > > Ok, I guess I should include more complete debug output. > > phy0 -> rt2x00usb_vendor_request: Error - Vendor Request 0x09 failed for > offset 0x0000 with error -32
- Vendor requests error with the -32 errors often indicate the incorrect device. > phy0 -> rt73usb_validate_eeprom: EEPROM recover - MAC: 66:76:2b:e8:68:e7 - Incorrect MAC address read from the device. Another hint that the device is not rt73. > phy0 -> rt2x00usb_vendor_request: Error - Vendor Request 0x07 failed for > offset 0x3000 with error -32 > phy0 -> rt2x00_set_chip: Info - Chipset detected - rt: 1300, rf: 0000, rev: > c03c0ae0 - A incorrect RF chipset. (valid values are: 1, 2, 3 or 4). Another indication of a incorrect device. - A completely bogus chipset revision. A valid rt73 device has the revision "2573X" Where only the X is a variable. > phy0 -> rt73usb_init_eeprom: Error - Invalid RF chipset detected > > ...so, I think hardware is indeed quite similar to what rt73usb driver > expects...? No. You can assume you are forcing rt73 to control a non-rt73 device. The fact that you had to hack to bypass the RT and RF chipset validation also confirms that, those checks were there for a reason. Namely to make sure the corect driver was being used for the device. Ivo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
