Ray Lee wrote: > I'm sorry, perhaps I poured myself a cup of stupid this morning, but > isn't the above patch effectively introducing a BUG where none could > be reached before? In other words, for the patch to have zero > behavioral change, wouldn't it have to remove the BUG() altogether?
True, but obviously not intended. I think the intention was to expose this bug. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
