Re: [PATCH v8 04/13] perf stat: factor out body of event handling loop for system wide

[Alexey Budankov]

On 23.06.2020 17:56, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 11:37:43AM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
>>
>> Introduce process_timeout() and process_interval() functions that
>> factor out body of event handling loop for attach and system wide
>> monitoring use cases.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budan...@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>  tools/perf/builtin-stat.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++--------
>>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
>> index 9be020e0098a..31f7ccf9537b 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
>> @@ -475,6 +475,23 @@ static void process_interval(void)
>>      print_counters(&rs, 0, NULL);
>>  }
>>  
>> +static bool print_interval(unsigned int interval, int *times)
>> +{
>> +    if (interval) {
>> +            process_interval();
>> +            if (interval_count && !(--(*times)))
>> +                    return true;
>> +    }
>> +    return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static bool process_timeout(int timeout, unsigned int interval, int *times)
>> +{
>> +    if (timeout)
>> +            return true;
>> +    return print_interval(interval, times);
>> +}
> 
> I think it's confusing to keep this together, that
> process_timeout triggers also interval processing
> 
> I think you can keep the timeout separated from interval
> processing and rename the print_interval to process_interval
> and process_interval to __process_interval

Well, ok.

I will rename process_interval() to __process_interval() and
then print_interval() to process_interval().

Regarding timeout let's have it like this:

static bool process_timeout(int timeout)
{
        return timeout ? true : false;
}

static bool process_timing_settings(int timeout, unsigned int interval, int 
*times)
{
        bool res = process_timeout(timeout);
        if (!res)
                res = process_interval(interval, times);
        return res; 
}

Ok?

~Alexey

> 
> jirka
> 
>> +
>>  static void enable_counters(void)
>>  {
>>      if (stat_config.initial_delay)
>> @@ -611,6 +628,7 @@ static int __run_perf_stat(int argc, const char **argv, 
>> int run_idx)
>>      struct affinity affinity;
>>      int i, cpu;
>>      bool second_pass = false;
>> +    bool stop = false;
>>  
>>      if (interval) {
>>              ts.tv_sec  = interval / USEC_PER_MSEC;
>> @@ -805,17 +823,11 @@ static int __run_perf_stat(int argc, const char 
>> **argv, int run_idx)
>>                      psignal(WTERMSIG(status), argv[0]);
>>      } else {
>>              enable_counters();
>> -            while (!done) {
>> +            while (!done && !stop) {
>>                      nanosleep(&ts, NULL);
>>                      if (!is_target_alive(&target, evsel_list->core.threads))
>>                              break;
>> -                    if (timeout)
>> -                            break;
>> -                    if (interval) {
>> -                            process_interval();
>> -                            if (interval_count && !(--times))
>> -                                    break;
>> -                    }
>> +                    stop = process_timeout(timeout, interval, &times);
>>              }
>>      }
>>  
>> -- 
>> 2.24.1
>>
>>
>