Giacomo Catenazzi wrote: > What do technical and regulatory differences have "driver/LSM module" that > is build-in and one that is modular? > It seems to me silly to find difference. A kernel with a new kernel module > is a new kernel. > *I* understand that, from a security and logic integrity point of view, there is not much difference between a rebuilt-from-source kernel, and a standard kernel from the distro with a new module loaded.
However, there is a big difference for other people, depending on their circumstances. * Some people live in organizations where the stock kernel is required, even if you are allowed to load modules. That may not make sense to you, but that doesn't change the rule. * Some people are not comfortable building kernels from source. It doesn't matter how easy *you* think it is, it is a significant barrier to entry for a lot of people. Especially if their day job is systems or security administration, and not kernel hacking. Think of it like device drivers: Linux would be an enterprise failure if you had to re-compile the kernel from source every time you added a new kind of device and device driver. Crispin -- Crispin Cowan, Ph.D. http://crispincowan.com/~crispin/ Itanium. Vista. GPLv3. Complexity at work - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/