----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----- > Von: "Kees Cook" <keesc...@chromium.org> > An: "Randy Dunlap" <rdun...@infradead.org> > CC: "Richard Weinberger" <richard.weinber...@gmail.com>, "richard" > <rich...@nod.at>, "Greg Kroah-Hartman" > <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>, "Prasad Sodagudi" <psoda...@codeaurora.org>, > "Sami Tolvanen" <samitolva...@google.com>, > "Amit Daniel Kachhap" <amit.kach...@arm.com>, "linux-kselftest" > <linux-kselft...@vger.kernel.org>, "clang-built-linux" > <clang-built-li...@googlegroups.com>, "linux-kernel" > <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 25. Juni 2020 08:06:18 > Betreff: Re: [PATCH drivers/misc 0/4] lkdtm: Various clean ups
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 06:45:47PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> Looks like lkdtm/bugs.c needs to get/use arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h >> but it actually uses arch/x86/um/asm/processor*.h, which does not have the >> needed structs etc. > > Should I just test for !UML in bugs.c? (This is all for the > lkdtm_DOUBLE_FAULT() test.) I already do those kinds of checks for the > lkdtm_UNSET_SMEP() test. e.g.: Just had a look. Yes, this sounds good to me. UML has CONFIG_X86_32=y but no GDT. :-) Thanks, //richard
