> >> I guess we can debug it in the old-fashioned ways.  The first of which is
> >> to palm the problem off on Pavel ;)
> 
> I look at the 2.6.23-mm1 and see that there's one hunk lost. This
> is the one Oleg re-sent some days ago (the mail thread subject was
> 2.6.23-mm1 thread exit_group issue). Here it is (sent 13 oct 2007):
> 
> --- kernel/fork.c~    2007-10-13 15:41:35.000000000 +0400
> +++ kernel/fork.c     2007-10-13 15:41:41.000000000 +0400
> @@ -1443,6 +1443,9 @@ long do_fork(unsigned long clone_flags,
>                       task_pid_nr_ns(p, current->nsproxy->pid_ns) :
>                               task_pid_vnr(p);
>  
> +             if (clone_flags & CLONE_PARENT_SETTID)
> +                     put_user(nr, parent_tidptr);
> +
>               if (clone_flags & CLONE_VFORK) {
>                       p->vfork_done = &vfork;
>                       init_completion(&vfork);
> 
> Please, try with this patch.

Thanks.  This patch does indeed seem to solve the problem.

Miklos
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to