On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 10:32:55AM +0200, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote: > Hi, > > On 26/6/20 6:33, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 10:06:03PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 9:25 PM Enric Balletbo i Serra > >> <enric.balle...@collabora.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> Remove the ambiguity with GPL-2.0 and use an explicit GPL-2.0-only > >>> tag. > >> > >> Is there any? Last time IIRC Greg told me that in the kernel the old > >> and new variants are okay. > > > > They are just fine, leave it alone, the in-kernel LICENSES/ files show > > the valid SPDX tags that the kernel allows at this point in time. > > > > I guess my confusion comes from seeing patch series doing this change in the > ML > instead of really reading the documentation. If it's clear, and as per > in-kernel > docs, it is, that a GPL-2.0 tag is a GPL-2.0 only license, that's fine with > me.
It is clear, no churn needed, thanks! greg k-h
