On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 10:20:17PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Tue, Oct 23 2007, Andi Kleen wrote: > > Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > >> You might want to put a BUG_ON(page & 0x3); Make sure > > >> you're not loosing information. (The m68k problem) > > > > > > That's a really good idea, thanks Boaz! I'll add that. > > > > It would be even better if you replaced all the magic numbers with defines > > or better accessors. > > All? There are two numbers, and all are confined to scatterlist.h > privately. Except the one in blk_rq_map_sg(), which was done on purpose > since I don't want to export that knowledge to others. So we definitely > don't want accessors, I can name the two bit values but don't see much > point in doing it.
Maybe no point for you, but it would be helpful for any poor soul who has to read/debug/change the code later. Even if they're limited right now that doesn't mean it'll stay that way anyways. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/