From: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Can we expand this macro definition, or should I look for a way to fool^W teach kernel-doc about this?
scripts/kernel-doc says: Error(linux-2.6.24-rc1//include/asm-x86/bitops_32.h:188): cannot understand prototype: 'test_and_set_bit_lock test_and_set_bit ' Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- include/asm-x86/bitops_32.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- linux-2.6.24-rc1.orig/include/asm-x86/bitops_32.h +++ linux-2.6.24-rc1/include/asm-x86/bitops_32.h @@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ static inline int test_and_set_bit(int n * * This is the same as test_and_set_bit on x86 */ -#define test_and_set_bit_lock test_and_set_bit +#define test_and_set_bit_lock(nr, addr) test_and_set_bit(nr, addr) /** * __test_and_set_bit - Set a bit and return its old value --- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/