> @@ -177,13 +177,13 @@ For example, to check drivers/net/wirele > To apply Coccinelle on a file basis, instead of a directory basis, the > following command may be used:: > > - make C=1 CHECK="scripts/coccicheck" > + make C=1 CHECK="scripts/coccicheck" path/to/file.c
Can such information still be questionable according to usual make functionality? * Do you usually expect that such a source file does not need to be regenerated (because it should be up-to-date already according a selected revision)? * Would you like to trigger the generation of a corresponding source code analysis log file (or a “diff”)? * How do you think about to pass an other parameter to the build target “coccicheck”? Regards, Markus
