Hello Dmitry

On 2020/05/12 7:23, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 10:56:05PM -0700, Jiada Wang wrote:
From: Nick Dyer <nick.d...@itdev.co.uk>

This patch outputs status from T48 Noise Supression

Signed-off-by: Nick Dyer <nick.d...@itdev.co.uk>
Acked-by: Benson Leung <ble...@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Yufeng Shen <mile...@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from ndyer/linux/for-upstream commit 
2895a6ff150a49f27a02938f8d262be238b296d8)
Signed-off-by: George G. Davis <george_da...@mentor.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiada Wang <jiada_w...@mentor.com>
---
  drivers/input/touchscreen/atmel_mxt_ts.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/atmel_mxt_ts.c 
b/drivers/input/touchscreen/atmel_mxt_ts.c
index 7e6a66e3e1e0..a53985a7736f 100644
--- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/atmel_mxt_ts.c
+++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/atmel_mxt_ts.c
@@ -324,6 +324,7 @@ struct mxt_data {
        u16 T18_address;
        u8 T19_reportid;
        u16 T44_address;
+       u8 T48_reportid;
        u8 T100_reportid_min;
        u8 T100_reportid_max;
@@ -978,6 +979,24 @@ static void mxt_proc_t100_message(struct mxt_data *data, u8 *message)
        data->update_input = true;
  }
+static int mxt_proc_t48_messages(struct mxt_data *data, u8 *msg)
+{
+       struct device *dev = &data->client->dev;
+       u8 status, state;
+
+       status = msg[1];
+       state  = msg[4];
+
+       dev_dbg(dev, "T48 state %d status %02X %s%s%s%s%s\n", state, status,
+               status & 0x01 ? "FREQCHG " : "",
+               status & 0x02 ? "APXCHG " : "",
+               status & 0x04 ? "ALGOERR " : "",
+               status & 0x10 ? "STATCHG " : "",
+               status & 0x20 ? "NLVLCHG " : "");

Should we define symbolic names for these bits, like you did for T42
in the next patch?

will replace with symbolic names in next version

Thanks,
Jiada

Thanks.

Reply via email to