On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 12:50:29PM +0100, Simon Arlott wrote: > I currently have an LSM that only handles permissions for socket_bind > and socket_listen, I load it and then "capability" as secondary on > boot - but now I can't because the LSM framework is now just the LS > framework. > > Why can't this "static LSM" change be a Kconfig option? > (I don't want to have to maintain my own reverted copy of security/, > or compile this into the kernel because then I can't ever modify and > reload it without rebooting.)
Let's start with the more important questions: Did you submit your LSM for inclusion into the kernel? If yes, why wasn't it accepted? If no, why not? > Simon Arlott cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/