On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 09:39:26AM +0200, Alain Volmat wrote: > SMBus Host-Notify protocol, from the adapter point of view > consist of receiving a message from a client, including the > client address and some other data. > > It can be simply handled by creating a new slave device > and registering a callback performing the parsing of the > message received from the client. > > This commit introduces two new core functions > * i2c_new_smbus_host_notify_device > * i2c_free_smbus_host_notify_device > that take care of registration of the new slave device and > callback and will call i2c_handle_smbus_host_notify once a > Host-Notify event is received. > > Signed-off-by: Alain Volmat <alain.vol...@st.com> > --- > v2: remove useless dev_err message in case of hnotify handling error > prevent handling hnotify in case of a incomplete write
Okay, now I got it to work, I also noted a few more issues.
First, I'd suggest s/i2c_smbus_host_notify/i2c_slave_host_notify/g for
all occurences in this patch. This makes a stronger distinction between
the generic HostNotify support and the slave specific one.
Also, I wonder if this shouldn't go to i2c-smbus.c instead but I haven't
checked if we end up in dependency hell then. Second best thought: at
least move to i2c-core-slave.c, then we could save the #ifdeffery in the
c-file?
>
> drivers/i2c/i2c-core-smbus.c | 110
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/i2c-smbus.h | 2 +
> 2 files changed, 112 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-smbus.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-smbus.c
> index 56bb840142e3..3a37664fb5f6 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-smbus.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-smbus.c
> @@ -708,3 +708,113 @@ int of_i2c_setup_smbus_alert(struct i2c_adapter
> *adapter)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_i2c_setup_smbus_alert);
> #endif
> +
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_I2C_SLAVE)
> +struct i2c_smbus_host_notify_status {
> + bool notify_start;
> + u8 addr;
> +};
> +
> +static int i2c_smbus_host_notify_cb(struct i2c_client *client,
> + enum i2c_slave_event event, u8 *val)
> +{
> + struct i2c_smbus_host_notify_status *status = client->dev.platform_data;
> + int ret;
> +
> + switch (event) {
> + case I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_REQUESTED:
> + status->notify_start = true;
> + break;
> + case I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_RECEIVED:
> + /* We only retrieve the first byte received (addr)
> + * since there is currently no support to retrieve the data
> + * parameter from the client.
> + */
> + if (!status->notify_start)
> + break;
> + status->addr = *val;
> + status->notify_start = false;
So, we are safe if the message is too short. Otherwise, we capture the
first byte (== address) only, right. Further bytes until STOP are
discarded. So, we don't check if the message is too long and contains
more than the status word. Maybe we should add that?
> + break;
> + case I2C_SLAVE_STOP:
> + /* In case of incomplete write, don't handle host-notify */
> + if (status->notify_start) {
> + status->notify_start = false;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + ret = i2c_handle_smbus_host_notify(client->adapter,
> + status->addr);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> + break;
> + default:
The missing cases are mandatory. From my testunit driver:
case I2C_SLAVE_READ_REQUESTED:
case I2C_SLAVE_READ_PROCESSED:
*val = 0xff;
break;
> + /* Only handle necessary events */
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
...
> --- a/include/linux/i2c-smbus.h
> +++ b/include/linux/i2c-smbus.h
> @@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ static inline int of_i2c_setup_smbus_alert(struct
> i2c_adapter *adap)
> return 0;
> }
> #endif
> +struct i2c_client *i2c_new_smbus_host_notify_device(struct i2c_adapter
> *adapter);
> +void i2c_free_smbus_host_notify_device(struct i2c_client *client);
Those need to be guarded with I2C_SLAVE as well. And an #else branch
with empty/successful placeholders.
>
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_I2C_SMBUS) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMI)
> void i2c_register_spd(struct i2c_adapter *adap);
> --
> 2.7.4
>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
