Seeing as sd_wait_data_idle() returns void and only a very specific
read value is checked, there doesn't seem to be a good reason to
check the return value of rtsx_pci_read_register().  So remove
the assignment and definition of 'err'.

Squashes the following W=1 kernel build warning:

 drivers/mmc/host/rtsx_pci_sdmmc.c: In function ‘sd_wait_data_idle’:
 drivers/mmc/host/rtsx_pci_sdmmc.c:678:6: warning: variable ‘err’ set but not 
used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
 678 | int err, i;
 | ^~~

Cc: Wei WANG <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/mmc/host/rtsx_pci_sdmmc.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/rtsx_pci_sdmmc.c 
b/drivers/mmc/host/rtsx_pci_sdmmc.c
index 5a71f6678fd3a..dc0dbd64a2a78 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/rtsx_pci_sdmmc.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/rtsx_pci_sdmmc.c
@@ -675,11 +675,11 @@ static u8 sd_search_final_phase(struct realtek_pci_sdmmc 
*host, u32 phase_map)
 
 static void sd_wait_data_idle(struct realtek_pci_sdmmc *host)
 {
-       int err, i;
+       int i;
        u8 val = 0;
 
        for (i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
-               err = rtsx_pci_read_register(host->pcr, SD_DATA_STATE, &val);
+               rtsx_pci_read_register(host->pcr, SD_DATA_STATE, &val);
                if (val & SD_DATA_IDLE)
                        return;
 
-- 
2.25.1

Reply via email to