Hi Laurent, On 01-07-20, 16:44, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > How about marking it as __maybe_unused instead? > > I don't mind either, I'll let Tobias decide, but his patch seems fine, > is there a drawback in his approach ? If it's just a matter of personal > preference, I'd rather not require a v2. __maybe_unused is the preferred way to do as Documented in Documentation/process/coding-style.rst and makes code look neater.. Thanks -- ~Vinod
