Re: Kernel crash due to memory corruption with v5.4.26-rt17 and PowerPC e500

[Sebastian Andrzej Siewior]

On 2020-05-29 18:37:22 [+0200], To Mark Marshall wrote:
> On 2020-05-29 18:15:18 [+0200], To Mark Marshall wrote:
> > In order to get it back into the RT queue I need to understand why it is
> > required. What exactly is it fixing. Let me stare at for a little…
> 
> it used to be local_irq_disable() which then became preempt_disable()
> local_irq_disable() due to ARM's limitation.

Any luck on your side?

I *think* if you swap the mm assignment in exec_mmap() then it should be
gone. Basically:
|         tsk->active_mm = mm;
|         tsk->mm = mm;

However I think to apply something like this:

diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -1035,11 +1035,15 @@ static int exec_mmap(struct mm_struct *mm)
                }
        }
        task_lock(tsk);
+
+       task_lock_mm();
        active_mm = tsk->active_mm;
        membarrier_exec_mmap(mm);
        tsk->mm = mm;
        tsk->active_mm = mm;
        activate_mm(active_mm, mm);
+       task_unlock_mm();
+
        tsk->mm->vmacache_seqnum = 0;
        vmacache_flush(tsk);
        task_unlock(tsk);
diff --git a/include/linux/sched/task.h b/include/linux/sched/task.h
--- a/include/linux/sched/task.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched/task.h
@@ -176,4 +176,31 @@ static inline void task_unlock(struct task_struct *p)
        spin_unlock(&p->alloc_lock);
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
+/*
+ * Protects ->mm and ->active_mm.
+ * Avoids scheduling so switch_mm() or enter_lazy_tlb() will not read the
+ * members while they are updated.
+ */
+static inline void task_lock_mm(void)
+{
+       preempt_disable();
+}
+
+static inline void task_unlock_mm(void)
+{
+       preempt_enable();
+}
+
+#else
+
+static inline void task_lock_mm(void)
+{
+}
+
+static inline void task_unlock_mm(void)
+{
+}
+#endif
+
 #endif /* _LINUX_SCHED_TASK_H */
diff --git a/mm/mmu_context.c b/mm/mmu_context.c
--- a/mm/mmu_context.c
+++ b/mm/mmu_context.c
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ void use_mm(struct mm_struct *mm)
        struct task_struct *tsk = current;
 
        task_lock(tsk);
+       task_lock_mm();
        active_mm = tsk->active_mm;
        if (active_mm != mm) {
                mmgrab(mm);
@@ -32,6 +33,7 @@ void use_mm(struct mm_struct *mm)
        }
        tsk->mm = mm;
        switch_mm(active_mm, mm, tsk);
+       task_unlock_mm();
        task_unlock(tsk);
 #ifdef finish_arch_post_lock_switch
        finish_arch_post_lock_switch();
@@ -55,10 +57,12 @@ void unuse_mm(struct mm_struct *mm)
        struct task_struct *tsk = current;
 
        task_lock(tsk);
+       task_lock_mm();
        sync_mm_rss(mm);
        tsk->mm = NULL;
        /* active_mm is still 'mm' */
        enter_lazy_tlb(mm, tsk);
+       task_unlock_mm();
        task_unlock(tsk);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(unuse_mm);
-- 
2.27.0

> > > Best regards,
> > > Mark

Sebastian