On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 12:21 PM <tudor.amba...@microchip.com> wrote:
>
> On 5/29/20 10:16 AM, Rayagonda Kokatanur wrote:
> > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the
> > content is safe
> >
> > Both w25q64 and s25fl064k nor flash support QUAD and DUAL read
> > command, hence update the same in flash_info table.
> >
> > This is tested on Broadcom Stingray SoC (bcm958742t).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rayagonda Kokatanur <rayagonda.kokata...@broadcom.com>
> > ---
> > Changes from v1:
> > -Address review comments from Vignesh Raghavendra
> > Update commit message with testing details.
> >
> > drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spansion.c | 3 ++-
> > drivers/mtd/spi-nor/winbond.c | 3 ++-
> > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spansion.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spansion.c
> > index 6756202ace4b..c91bbb8d9cd6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spansion.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spansion.c
> > @@ -52,7 +52,8 @@ static const struct flash_info spansion_parts[] = {
> > SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ |
> > SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ) },
> > { "s25fl016k", INFO(0xef4015, 0, 64 * 1024, 32,
> > SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ |
> > SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ) },
> > - { "s25fl064k", INFO(0xef4017, 0, 64 * 1024, 128, SECT_4K) },
> > + { "s25fl064k", INFO(0xef4017, 0, 64 * 1024, 128,
> > + SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ |
> > SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ) },
> > { "s25fl116k", INFO(0x014015, 0, 64 * 1024, 32,
> > SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ |
> > SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ) },
> > { "s25fl132k", INFO(0x014016, 0, 64 * 1024, 64, SECT_4K) },
> > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/winbond.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/winbond.c
> > index 17deabad57e1..2028cab3eff9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/winbond.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/winbond.c
> > @@ -39,7 +39,8 @@ static const struct flash_info winbond_parts[] = {
> > SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ
> > |
> > SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK | SPI_NOR_HAS_TB) },
> > { "w25x64", INFO(0xef3017, 0, 64 * 1024, 128, SECT_4K) },
> > - { "w25q64", INFO(0xef4017, 0, 64 * 1024, 128, SECT_4K) },
> > + { "w25q64", INFO(0xef4017, 0, 64 * 1024, 128,
> > + SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ) },
>
> I checked the winbond website and from all the w25q64 flashes, W25Q64JV-IQ/JQ
> and W25Q64FV share the 0xef4017 flash ID. Both support 0x3b and 0x6b commands,
> which is fine.
>
> I see that s25fl064k and w25q64 share the same flash ID. The search alg will
> return the first hit, so s25fl064k even for the winbond parts. What is the
> difference between s25fl064k and W25Q64JVQ/W25Q64FV?
I think both are from different vendor.
Please refer link for more info -
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/628090/
Best regards,
Rayagonda
>
> Cheers,
> ta
