On 10/25/07, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote: > > Guys, > > > > is there any particular reason we're using -traditional in > > EXTRA_AFLAGS in Makefiles? > > > > What? Where? I thought I removed them all. Or is this from the x86_64 > tree?
This is from arch/x86/kernel/Makefile_64 > > I'd suggest just removing it, but obviously, there might well be > > people with good reasons for it to stay (The same effect of token > > pasting can be achieved in some ways, so if -traditional stays, that's > > not the greatest problem in the world... just that token pasting in > > asm files will diverge from the way in which we (-)traditionally do > > ;-) ) > > > > So, does any one have a word on that? > > > > > Kill -traditional where ever it may be. You might need to fix up some > cruft in the process, but shouldn't be too hard. > I only feel confortable about killing it from x86_64 or any other arches I may have access to. Otherwise, there's no way I can fix up the crufts ;) A patch for Makefile_64 will follow in a while. -- Glauber de Oliveira Costa. "Free as in Freedom" http://glommer.net "The less confident you are, the more serious you have to act." - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
