On 07/07/2020 17:47, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 7/7/20 2:01 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> When the network is not configured, the netlink are disabled on all
>> the system. The thermal framework assumed the netlink are always
>> opt-in.
>>
>> Fix this by adding a Kconfig option for the netlink notification,
>> defaulting to yes and depending on CONFIG_NET.
>>
>> As the change implies multiple stubs and in order to not pollute the
>> internal thermal header, the thermal_nelink.h has been added and
>> included in the thermal_core.h, so this one regain some kind of
>> clarity.
>>
>> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdun...@infradead.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezc...@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>  drivers/thermal/Kconfig           | 10 ++++
>>  drivers/thermal/Makefile          |  5 +-
>>  drivers/thermal/thermal_core.h    | 20 +------
>>  drivers/thermal/thermal_netlink.h | 98 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  4 files changed, 114 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>>  create mode 100644 drivers/thermal/thermal_netlink.h
>>
> 
> 
> Hm, now I get this:
> 
> ../drivers/thermal/thermal_helpers.c: In function 
> ‘thermal_cdev_set_cur_state’:
> ../drivers/thermal/thermal_helpers.c:182:2: error: implicit declaration of 
> function ‘thermal_notify_cdev_update’; did you mean 
> ‘thermal_notify_cdev_delete’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   thermal_notify_cdev_update(cdev->id, target);
> 
> 
> or should that call be to thermal_notify_cdev_state_update()?

Ah right, the patch applies on top of the v4 which is not yet in
linux-next, I'm waiting for the kernelci loop result.


-- 
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

Reply via email to