"H. Peter Anvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Eric W. Biederman wrote: >>>> >>> Well, the original motivation for all of this was to enable implementation >>> of > a >>> EFI framebuffer (UGA/GOP). Now, you can say what you want about EFI (and I >>> definitely have my opinion on it), but that seems legitimate to me. >> >> To be very clear. I think we need the EFI boot parameters but >> we certainly don't runtime services to implement an EFI framebuffer. >> > > Ying claimed that GOP requires EFI runtime services. Is that not true?
None of the EFI framebuffer patches that I saw used EFI runtime services. Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
