Hi Alex,
> From: Liu, Yi L < yi.l....@intel.com>
> Sent: Friday, July 3, 2020 2:28 PM
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> > From: Alex Williamson <alex.william...@redhat.com>
> > Sent: Friday, July 3, 2020 5:19 AM
> >
> > On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 01:55:19 -0700
> > Liu Yi L <yi.l....@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > > This patch allows user space to request PASID allocation/free, e.g.
> > > when serving the request from the guest.
> > >
> > > PASIDs that are not freed by userspace are automatically freed when
> > > the IOASID set is destroyed when process exits.
[...]
> > > +static int vfio_iommu_type1_pasid_request(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> > > + unsigned long arg)
> > > +{
> > > + struct vfio_iommu_type1_pasid_request req;
> > > + unsigned long minsz;
> > > +
> > > + minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_iommu_type1_pasid_request, range);
> > > +
> > > + if (copy_from_user(&req, (void __user *)arg, minsz))
> > > + return -EFAULT;
> > > +
> > > + if (req.argsz < minsz || (req.flags & ~VFIO_PASID_REQUEST_MASK))
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > + if (req.range.min > req.range.max)
> >
> > Is it exploitable that a user can spin the kernel for a long time in
> > the case of a free by calling this with [0, MAX_UINT] regardless of their
> > actual
> allocations?
>
> IOASID can ensure that user can only free the PASIDs allocated to the user.
> but
> it's true, kernel needs to loop all the PASIDs within the range provided by
> user. it
> may take a long time. is there anything we can do? one thing may limit the
> range
> provided by user?
thought about it more, we have per-VM pasid quota (say 1000), so even if
user passed down [0, MAX_UNIT], kernel will only loop the 1000 pasids at
most. do you think we still need to do something on it?
Regards,
Yi Liu
