On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 04:37:26PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > + * Use the ``_irqsave`` and ``_bh`` variants instead if the read side > + * ``_bh`` variant of write_seqlock(). Use only if the read side section > + * ``_irq`` variant of write_sequnlock(). The write side section of > + * ``_irqsave`` variant of write_seqlock(). Use if the read section of > + * ``_irqrestore`` variant of write_sequnlock(). The write section of > + * ``_bh`` variant of read_seqlock_excl(). Use this variant if the > + * ``_bh`` variant of read_sequnlock_excl(). The closed section must've > + * ``_irq`` variant of read_seqlock_excl(). Use this only if the > + * ``_irq`` variant of read_sequnlock_excl(). The closed section must've > + * ``_irqsave`` variant of read_seqlock_excl(). Use this only if the > + * ``_irqrestore`` variant of read_sequnlock_excl(). The closed section > + * This is the ``_irqsave`` variant of read_seqbegin_or_lock(). Use if > + * This is the ``_irqrestore`` variant of done_seqretry(). The read
Can we also get rid of that '' nonsense, the gods of ASCII gifted us " for this.
