On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 09:05:14PM -0700, Mike Tipton wrote:
> Add generic qcom interconnect bindings that are common across platforms. In
> particular, these include QCOM_ICC_TAG_* macros that clients can use when
> calling icc_set_tag().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mike Tipton <mdtip...@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  include/dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,icc.h | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,icc.h
> 
> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,icc.h 
> b/include/dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,icc.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..cd34f36daaaa
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,icc.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2020, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __DT_BINDINGS_INTERCONNECT_QCOM_ICC_H
> +#define __DT_BINDINGS_INTERCONNECT_QCOM_ICC_H
> +
> +/*
> + * The AMC bucket denotes constraints that are applied to hardware when
> + * icc_set_bw() completes, whereas the WAKE and SLEEP constraints are applied
> + * when the execution environment transitions between active and low power 
> mode.
> + */
> +#define QCOM_ICC_BUCKET_AMC          0
> +#define QCOM_ICC_BUCKET_WAKE         1
> +#define QCOM_ICC_BUCKET_SLEEP                2
> +#define QCOM_ICC_NUM_BUCKETS         3
> +
> +#define QCOM_ICC_TAG_AMC             (1 << QCOM_ICC_BUCKET_AMC)
> +#define QCOM_ICC_TAG_WAKE            (1 << QCOM_ICC_BUCKET_WAKE)
> +#define QCOM_ICC_TAG_SLEEP           (1 << QCOM_ICC_BUCKET_SLEEP)
> +#define QCOM_ICC_TAG_ACTIVE_ONLY     (QCOM_ICC_TAG_AMC | QCOM_ICC_TAG_WAKE)
> +#define QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS          (QCOM_ICC_TAG_AMC | QCOM_ICC_TAG_WAKE |\
> +                                      QCOM_ICC_TAG_SLEEP)
> +
> +#endif

Would it make sense to squash the two patches of this series into a
single patch? This would make it more evident that this was moved
from drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpmh.h and avoid duplicate
definitions if only this patch was applied.

Reply via email to