On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 12:51:58PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote: > > > 在 2020/7/10 上午12:07, Kirill A. Shutemov 写道: > > Right, and it's never got removed from LRU during the split. The tail > > pages have to be added to LRU because they now separate from the tail > > page. > > > According to the explaination, looks like we could remove the code path, > since it's never got into. (base on my v15 patchset). Any comments?
Yes. But why? It's reasonable failsafe that gives chance to recover if something goes wrong. -- Kirill A. Shutemov
