On Mon, 13 Jul 2020 11:39:56 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: > > > > On Mon, 13 Jul 2020, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > On Mon, 13 Jul 2020 10:43:28 +0200, > > Julia Lawall wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 13 Jul 2020, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, 08 Jul 2020 20:14:27 +0200, > > > > Dan Williams wrote: > > > > > > > > > > +Recommended replacements for 'blacklist/whitelist' are: > > > > > + 'denylist / allowlist' > > > > > + 'blocklist / passlist' > > > > > > > > I started looking through the tree now and noticed there are lots of > > > > patterns like "whitelisted" or "blacklisted". How can the words fit > > > > for those? Actually, there are two cases like: > > > > > > > > - Foo is blacklisted > > > > - Allow to load the non-whitelisted cards > > > > > > > > Currently I'm replacing the former with "Foo is in denylist", but not > > > > > > In the denylist? > > > > Not really, only the allowlist exists in this case. > > I'm not sure to understand. in denylist is not grammatical. It needs "a" > or "the".
Ah, now I see how I confused you. The two cases I mentioned in the above are completely individual. They were found in two different drivers. I put those just as two distinct examples for the passive form usages. Sorry for unclearness. What I meant about the latter was that "not in allowlist" doesn't mean it being "in denylist". It's simply unknown. Takashi
