On 9 Jan 2001, Christoph Rohland wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
> > D'oh, right --- so can't you lock a segment just by bumping
> > page_count on its pages?
>
> Looks like a good idea.
>
> Oh, and my last posting was partly bogus: I can directly get the pages
> with page cache lookups on the file.
Even more appropriately, you have the inode->i_mapping lists that you can
use directly (no need to do lookups, just walk the list).
Note that bumping the counts is _NOT_ as easy as you seem to think. The
problem: vmtruncate() and friends. It's much easier to just have a flag
that gets cleared on truncate.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? Rik van Riel
- Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? Linus Torvalds
- Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? Rik van Riel
- Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? Christoph Rohland
- Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? Christoph Rohland
- Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0... Christoph Rohland
- Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0... Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0... Christoph Rohland
- Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0... Linus Torvalds
- Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0... Daniel Phillips
- Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0... Rik van Riel
- Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0... Christoph Rohland
- Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0... Daniel Phillips
- Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0... Linus Torvalds
- Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? Linus Torvalds
- Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? Christoph Rohland
- Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0... Linus Torvalds
- Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0... Christoph Rohland
- Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0... Tim Wright

