On Fri, 26 Oct 2007, David Rientjes wrote: > You would pass NODE_MASK_ALL if your intent was to interleave over > everything you have access to, yes. Otherwise you can pass whatever you > want access to and your interleaved nodemask becomes > mpol_rebind_policy()'s newmask formal (the cpuset's new mems_allowed) > AND'd with pol->passed_nodemask.
We would need two fields in the policy structure 1. The specified nodemask (generally ignored) 2. The effective nodemask (specified & cpuset_mems_allowed) If we have these two then its easy to get a bit further by making the first nodemask a relative nodemask. The calculation of the effective nodemask changes somewhat but the logic is then applicable to MPOL_BIND as well. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
