On Fri, Jul 03, 2020 at 02:59:12PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 7/3/20 8:37 AM, Daniel M. Weeks wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel M. Weeks <d...@danweeks.net>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/lm75.txt | 2 +-
> >  drivers/hwmon/lm75.c                             | 8 ++++----
> >  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/lm75.txt 
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/lm75.txt
> > index 273616702c51..e5bb554cd2c3 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/lm75.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/lm75.txt
> > @@ -14,10 +14,10 @@ Required properties:
> >             "maxim,max6626",
> >             "maxim,max31725",
> >             "maxim,max31726",
> > -           "maxim,mcp980x",
> >             "nxp,pct2075",
> >             "st,stds75",
> >             "st,stlm75",
> > +           "microchip,mcp980x",
> >             "microchip,tcn75",
> >             "ti,tmp100",
> >             "ti,tmp101",
> > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/lm75.c b/drivers/hwmon/lm75.c
> > index ba0be48aeadd..a8cfc7e4a685 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hwmon/lm75.c
> > +++ b/drivers/hwmon/lm75.c
> > @@ -690,10 +690,6 @@ static const struct of_device_id __maybe_unused 
> > lm75_of_match[] = {
> >             .compatible = "maxim,max31726",
> >             .data = (void *)max31725
> >     },
> > -   {
> > -           .compatible = "maxim,mcp980x",
> > -           .data = (void *)mcp980x
> > -   },
> >     {
> >             .compatible = "nxp,pct2075",
> >             .data = (void *)pct2075
> > @@ -706,6 +702,10 @@ static const struct of_device_id __maybe_unused 
> > lm75_of_match[] = {
> >             .compatible = "st,stlm75",
> >             .data = (void *)stlm75
> >     },
> > +   {
> > +           .compatible = "microchip,mcp980x",
> > +           .data = (void *)mcp980x
> 
> Hmm, makes me wonder if we should replace this with correct chip names
> since we are at it. After all, it only includes mcp980{0,1,2,3} and not 
> mcp9805.
> 
> Rob, any thoughts ?

Do we need to distinguish the chips? Aren't there existing users?

Rob

Reply via email to