> When nfc_register_device fails in nci_register_device, > destroy_workqueue() shouled be called to destroy ndev->tx_wq.
Would an other imperative wording be preferred for the commit message? https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?id=f8456690ba8eb18ea4714e68554e242a04f65cff#n151 … > +++ b/net/nfc/nci/core.c > @@ -1228,10 +1228,13 @@ int nci_register_device(struct nci_dev *ndev) > > rc = nfc_register_device(ndev->nfc_dev); > if (rc) > - goto destroy_rx_wq_exit; > + goto destroy_tx_wq_exit; > > goto exit; > > +destroy_tx_wq_exit: > + destroy_workqueue(ndev->tx_wq); … How do you think about to use the following source code variant for this function implementation? if (!rc) goto exit; destroy_workqueue(ndev->tx_wq); Regards, Markus
