On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 11:21:39AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 12:20:52AM -0700, ira.we...@intel.com wrote:
> > @@ -31,6 +32,20 @@ static inline void invalidate_kernel_vmap_range(void
> > *vaddr, int size)
> >
> > #include <asm/kmap_types.h>
> >
> > +static inline void enable_access(struct page *page)
> > +{
> > + if (!page_is_access_protected(page))
> > + return;
> > + dev_access_enable();
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void disable_access(struct page *page)
> > +{
> > + if (!page_is_access_protected(page))
> > + return;
> > + dev_access_disable();
> > +}
>
> These are some very generic names, do we want them to be a little more
> specific?
I had them named kmap_* but Dave (I think it was Dave) thought they did not
really apply strictly to kmap_*.
They are static to this file which I thought may be sufficient to 'uniqify'
them?
I'm ok to change them but that is how I arrived at this name.
Ira
