On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 13:16:14 +0200 Toralf Förster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I use the following one liner for regression tests of the cpufreq governor and > friends: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ time factor 819734028463158891 > > which usually needs 5.5 secs to complete at 1.7 GHz of my pentium M processor. > > With the current git sources (commit cfa76f0 at Sat Oct 20 20:19:15 2007 > -0700) > instead this command needs 3 times longer if I run the "distributed.net > client" > as a background process with nice level 19 b/c the cpu frequency still stays > at 600 MHz. > After stopping dnetc the cpu frequency governor ondemand works as expected > again. > > Tested at my ThinkPad T41 with stable Gentoo: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ grep -e ^CONFIG_ACPI -e ^CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_ > ~/devel/linux-2.6/.config > CONFIG_ACPI=y > CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP=y > CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS=y > CONFIG_ACPI_PROC_EVENT=y > CONFIG_ACPI_AC=m > CONFIG_ACPI_BATTERY=m > CONFIG_ACPI_BUTTON=m > CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO=m > CONFIG_ACPI_FAN=m > CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR=m > CONFIG_ACPI_THERMAL=m > CONFIG_ACPI_BLACKLIST_YEAR=0 > CONFIG_ACPI_EC=y > CONFIG_ACPI_POWER=y > CONFIG_ACPI_SYSTEM=y > CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_PERFORMANCE=y > CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_POWERSAVE=m > CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_ONDEMAND=y > And 2.6.23 was OK? Is this problem still present in Linus's current tree? Thanks. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/