> > __ipmi_bmc_register() jumps to the label 'out_free_my_dev_name' in an > > error path. So we can remove duplicate code in the if (rv). > > Looks correct, queued for next release.
1. Can an imperative wording be preferred for the change description? 2. Will the tag “Fixes” become helpful for the commit message? 3. Did you avoid a typo in the patch subject? Regards, Markus
