On Wed, 2020-07-22 at 15:17 +0800, Miles Chen wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 23:19 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> > 
> > On 21/07/2020 13:24, Yong Wu wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 11:40 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On 21/07/2020 04:16, Miles Chen wrote:
> > >>> In previous discussion [1] and [2], we found that it is risky to
> > >>> use max_pfn or totalram_pages to tell if 4GB mode is enabled.
> > >>>
> > >>> Check 4GB mode by reading infracfg register, remove the usage
> > >>> of the un-exported symbol max_pfn.
> > >>>
> > >>> This is a step towards building mtk_iommu as a kernel module.
> > >>>
> > >>> Change since v1:
> > >>> 1. remove the phandle usage, search for infracfg instead [3]
> > >>> 2. use infracfg instead of infracfg_regmap
> > >>> 3. move infracfg definitaions to linux/soc/mediatek/infracfg.h
> > >>> 4. update enable_4GB only when has_4gb_mode
> > >>>
> > >>> [1] 
> > >>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/6/3/733__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!w5YjY83YRL9_ijgXHwB1x2Dnb5BqiFUI8H5IAyAWWFMvUJKI9Qbj_zta2AaiFZejiQ$
> > >>>  
> > >>> [2] 
> > >>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/6/4/136__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!w5YjY83YRL9_ijgXHwB1x2Dnb5BqiFUI8H5IAyAWWFMvUJKI9Qbj_zta2Aa9U2yQyg$
> > >>>  
> > >>> [3] 
> > >>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/7/15/1147__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!w5YjY83YRL9_ijgXHwB1x2Dnb5BqiFUI8H5IAyAWWFMvUJKI9Qbj_zta2Aaxpk_Wjw$
> > >>>  
> > >>>
> > >>> Cc: Mike Rapoport <r...@linux.ibm.com>
> > >>> Cc: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>
> > >>> Cc: Yong Wu <yong...@mediatek.com>
> > >>> Cc: Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.c...@mediatek.com>
> > >>> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de>
> > >>> Cc: Yong Wu <yong...@mediatek.com>
> > >>> Cc: Chao Hao <chao....@mediatek.com>
> > >>> Cc: Rob Herring <r...@kernel.org>
> > >>> Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias....@gmail.com>
> > >>> Signed-off-by: Miles Chen <miles.c...@mediatek.com>
> > >>> ---
> > >>>    drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c             | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > >>>    include/linux/soc/mediatek/infracfg.h |  3 +++
> > >>>    2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >>>
> > >>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> > >>> index 2be96f1cdbd2..16765f532853 100644
> > >>> --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> > >>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> > >>> @@ -3,7 +3,6 @@
> > >>>     * Copyright (c) 2015-2016 MediaTek Inc.
> > >>>     * Author: Yong Wu <yong...@mediatek.com>
> > >>>     */
> > >>> -#include <linux/memblock.h>
> > >>>    #include <linux/bug.h>
> > >>>    #include <linux/clk.h>
> > >>>    #include <linux/component.h>
> > >>> @@ -15,13 +14,16 @@
> > >>>    #include <linux/iommu.h>
> > >>>    #include <linux/iopoll.h>
> > >>>    #include <linux/list.h>
> > >>> +#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
> > >>>    #include <linux/of_address.h>
> > >>>    #include <linux/of_iommu.h>
> > >>>    #include <linux/of_irq.h>
> > >>>    #include <linux/of_platform.h>
> > >>>    #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > >>> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
> > >>>    #include <linux/slab.h>
> > >>>    #include <linux/spinlock.h>
> > >>> +#include <linux/soc/mediatek/infracfg.h>
> > >>>    #include <asm/barrier.h>
> > >>>    #include <soc/mediatek/smi.h>
> > >>>    
> > >>> @@ -599,8 +601,10 @@ static int mtk_iommu_probe(struct platform_device 
> > >>> *pdev)
> > >>>         struct resource         *res;
> > >>>         resource_size_t         ioaddr;
> > >>>         struct component_match  *match = NULL;
> > >>> +       struct regmap           *infracfg;
> > >>>         void                    *protect;
> > >>>         int                     i, larb_nr, ret;
> > >>> +       u32                     val;
> > >>>    
> > >>>         data = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
> > >>>         if (!data)
> > >>> @@ -614,10 +618,22 @@ static int mtk_iommu_probe(struct platform_device 
> > >>> *pdev)
> > >>>                 return -ENOMEM;
> > >>>         data->protect_base = ALIGN(virt_to_phys(protect), 
> > >>> MTK_PROTECT_PA_ALIGN);
> > >>>    
> > >>> -       /* Whether the current dram is over 4GB */
> > >>> -       data->enable_4GB = !!(max_pfn > (BIT_ULL(32) >> PAGE_SHIFT));
> > >>> -       if (!data->plat_data->has_4gb_mode)
> > >>> -               data->enable_4GB = false;
> > >>> +       data->enable_4GB = false;
> > >>> +       if (data->plat_data->has_4gb_mode) {
> > >>> +               infracfg = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible(
> > >>> +                               "mediatek,mt8173-infracfg");
> > >>> +               if (IS_ERR(infracfg)) {
> > >>> +                       infracfg = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible(
> > >>> +                                       "mediatek,mt2712-infracfg");
> > >>> +                       if (IS_ERR(infracfg))
> > >>> +                               return PTR_ERR(infracfg);
> > >>
> > >> I think we should check m4u_plat instead to decide which compatible we 
> > >> have to
> > >> look for.
> > >> Another option would be to add a general compatible something like
> > >> "mtk-infracfg" and search for that. That would need an update of all DTS 
> > >> having
> > >> a infracfg compatible right now. After thinking twice, this would break 
> > >> newer
> > >> kernel with older device tree, so maybe it's better to go with m4u_plat 
> > >> switch
> > >> statement.
> > > 
> > > Add a "char *infracfg" in the plat_data, Use the mt2712, mt8173
> > > corresponding string in it. If it is NULL, It means the "enable_4GB"
> > > always is false. Then we also can remove the flag "has_4gb_mode".
> > > 
> > > is this OK?
> > > 
> > 
> > It's an option, but I personally find that a bit hacky.
> 
> Thanks Yong and Matthias for your comment.
> I will try adding a char *infracfg in patch v3.
> 

I misunderstood the comment.
I should check m4u_plat to decide which string to look for, not adding a
char *infracfg in patch v3.


Miles
> 
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Matthias
> 

Reply via email to